Thursday, January 14, 2010
Du'a
Sunday, January 10, 2010
reversing directions like a lever
sit still physically
while flowing about, moving me.
they’re forever protected, endlessly true
but in a folly those steeped in batil rabidly pursue
attempting to extinguish a phoenix-like flame.
these words are like no other
because no matter how hard they try
it can’t be smothered.
scribes want to twist
scholars want to dismiss
political enforcers order a cease and desist
they can try but they’ll fail.
the one who bought their souls on sale - devil
got them hooked to a tall tale
lies, lies, only lies.
these words are eternal truths
wholly and completely eraser proof
changing lives, changing ways day after day.
its eaters and readers rising to the level of angels
these are words to exist forever
reversing directions like a lever.
devils engineer their greatest designs
it’ll only be a waste of time
because these words, protected, exist forever
and with each attempt made on it, they radiate, melting all fetters...
Monday, August 31, 2009
Coming Back
How can I describe coming back and getting into the mix of things after six weeks in a country that left its charm on me? It’s difficult, well not so much difficult but really it’s a little hard. Anybody who has a home can easily become comfortable because of their knowing the situation they’re in, knowing how to get around, how to operate, basically the ins and outs of daily life. That’s a good thing but, at the same time, the spontaneity, the newness, the learning about a culture and people which inevitably leads to a person learning about their own self, these things bring out so much in a person. It’s true that we can learn a lot while at home but, the level and the amount we learn while we’re away seems to magnify big time. At least in my case it did.
Coming back I realized how much I’ve changed and though it may sound cliché, it’s nevertheless a true thing. Like the size of a tree can be gauged against a mountain or a hill, I’ve gauged myself against people here, people I know, some who may be friends, others who may be acquaintances and still others who I’ve never met but have heard or heard of and gained an insight into their thought. Sometimes this gauging is done on purpose but most times for me, it’s not. And gauging myself against others I’ve seen that my way of thinking hasn’t necessarily changed full circle but has actually gone through a growing phase. What was theory is now a reality for me, what was large is now small. Big issues are minor ones now. Rivers and lakes were big but after seeing the Atlantic they’re a drop of water. Beaches were vast, but after walking, riding and sleeping on the Sahara, they’re sandboxes. I feel as if my eyes have been replaced and I am seeing things in a new life and unfortunately, this is going to lead me to a point of departure with some. Though it may not be a physical one, mentally I may not be there any longer or in full attention. How can one convey an experience? How can a person explain what true poverty is, a poverty where there is absolutely no foreseeable way out? And at the same time, how can one describe the embrace that would be given to a lifelong friend that’s given to a person only known for a week? Most importantly though, how can one explain a community? In a society that stresses the self, the independent self, over and over again, how can it be explained or talked about to give of yourself and to let go of selfish tendencies? Maybe I could try, maybe I could share stories but in the end, from what I’ve experienced, a story is started to be shared and after 2 ½ minutes attention is turned away and before you know it, no one’s listening anymore. How then is insight to be given?
Coming back, I’ve seen what I’ve only thought in the past; that sometimes a person is at home where they are not at home. That is to say, where we are born and raised is considered our home but in the true and fully encompassing definition, it’s not necessarily our home. Where I was, I felt at home, I could in all reality think clearly and function much better than the place where I’ve been brought up. Maybe it was the atmosphere, maybe the people, who knows. One thing is for sure, I did feel more at home there than here.
Things are different here now and business will not be as usual. In fact, business can’t be as usual, this is just a part of life, a growing stage that we enter into. I hope that Insha’Allah my changes and development will be the kind that can enable me to become a better individual for the collective whole and to contribute as much as possible wherever possible. There are some who may travel the world and see everything and their travels which broaden their scope combine with an ego to turn them into cocky condescending types. This is a shame and hopefully this won’t come of me. However, it’s true that once going through life a person changes drastically and actually can experience a social shock when getting back into the social “norms” of their old community. As a lyricist once said
"The world looks a lot different after you do a bid
The way your life done changed
While primitive minds (are) still stuck in the same game"
Thursday, August 6, 2009
Trouble in Tangier Part 2
Monday, August 3, 2009
Trouble in Tangier

Yesterday turned out to be an interesting day. This past weekend our group took a trip to Asilah (in Morocco) as a kind of vacation to get a free mind before the start of reviews, cramming and finals for this summer session. Asilah is a beautiful place, on the coast not far at all from Spain, in fact many of the Moroccans speak Spanish fluently here and it's not unusual to see a Spanish flag here or there. Across from the hotel we roomed in was a beach and if we took a 15 minute walk on the boardwalk we'd reach an area which had an abundance of restaurants, most of which served fresh seafood.
Thursday, July 9, 2009
So far...
Wednesday, June 17, 2009
Some Comments on post-election Iran
A week removed from the elections in Iran and there are protests in the streets. At last count 7 have been confirmed killed so far. So many are protesting the re-election of Mahmoud Ahmedinejad, the president who has consistently made statements against Zionist Israel and the support that’s been given to them by various countries throughout the world. Due to his position and verbal expression he’s been looked down on and stigmatized by many world powers, most of them hailing from the west.
Many especially the younger adults in Iran have seen the way President Ahmedinejad has spoken and conducted himself as shameful to Iran and Iranians. They feel that he’s making conditions worse for Iran by bringing sanctions upon them and drawing the ire of the world (well, the western world) onto them. Of course there are other issues at hand too, which include what is viewed as a huge mismanagement of money and not taking care of business at home. Due to these and other reasons Mir-Hossein Mousavi has been championed as the candidate of change. He’s been put out there as the one who will make Iran acceptable in the eyes of the west (the world) and for the younger adults he’s what Obama was to the young people in the U.S.; a symbol of hope. So these have and continue to don their green ribbons and wristbands symbolic of their support for Mousavi. They wanted change and they voted for it with their heart and might however something happened; they lost.
The days leading up to and during the election world (west) media said there would be a neck and neck race and the election would be a very close and tight one. And it was with the Ahmedinejad and Mousavi coming in first and second place respectively however, the current president received over 60% of the votes while Mousavi got around 30%. How could this happen, how could this guy win the election? There were so many people in support of Mousavi and he received less than half of what Ahmedinejad did? It was a fraud, election fraud, recount, recount, have to recount the votes because the election is not legitimate! This is what was being said by the world (west) media and by many greenies who felt disenfranchised. However, we must ask, where does this idea of voter fraud come from, is there any evidence of it? Were some being intimidated and others turned away from the vote? Of course there are stories of it, but has proof been produced and also were the people (if there were) who abused power part of the incumbent’s crew or were they simply individuals too keen on getting the person they supported in office? In short, were these zealous persons acting as individuals or were they a part of a group and/or part of the incumbents circle? Of course these stories are heard but have stories been heard post election about any kind of similar incidents to restrict voting for President Ahmedinejad? Maybe they haven’t been heard because no such thing’s happened. Then again according to MSN news three individuals were not yelled at, run off or beaten to prevent them to vote but, they were shot. Three persons including a child were shot at the president’s voting headquarters (http://news.in.msn.com/international/article.aspx?cp-documentid=3036132). Perhaps there are more stories such as these that are currently being neglected by the world (west) media. Who knows.
So the greenies felt disenfranchised because their voting didn’t get their man into office. They decided to take their dissatisfaction out to the streets and demand the world (maybe west? Hmmm…) hear them and know how they feel. In fact, not only did they take this tactic, Mousavi himself said he’d be out in the street and wouldn’t be satisfied until he received a voting recount. Since the election the world (..you know what goes here) media has been talking about Iran consistently. Images have shown up of people who have been shot (perhaps one of the individuals who have died) in a news media that’s known for its clean, bleached broadcasts in which violent image are more or less banned. One has to wonder why exactly the western media has taken such a strong interest in the elections in Iran and more than that, why they’re so interested in seeing a recount and having Mousavi elected. This seems similar to the Darfur issue in the sense that the entire continent of Africa is typically a neglected entity by the west yet when the Darfur issue came up everyone wanted to all of a sudden care about the Sudan. Of course we ought to assume that this is a genuine interest and that it’s not related to the oil beneath the sands of the Sudan. Iran too was more or less a neglected entity in as far as its internal politics were concerned (at least to the extent that it wouldn’t garner attention in the daily news) but now, the spotlight is shining on high over the election and Iranian politics. Why is this?
Through nearly the entire existence of mass media or even simply media, the main means of communication have been utilized by one group of people or another to spread a message whether true or false. During times of war, psychological wars have been waged through the dissemination of propaganda into the minds of the citizens of a nation waging war as well as into the minds of citizens of a nation on whom war has been declared. From the last few years the world (…) media has gone to the lengths of promoting Ahmedinejad as an anti-semite (whoever sees this term ought to define it and determine what constitutes a person being Semitic), a racist, a warmonger, a person against human rights and everything else under the sun. This has been put into the heads of people in the west as well as people in Iran. Often, in the days leading up to the election, during the election and after the same terminology used by the media has found its way into the mouths of protestors almost verbatim. Of course this could be because the description of Ahmedinejad is true but then again, it could be because greenies are parroting what they’ve heard said. Regardless, the media has played a large role in influencing the minds and hearts of the public both in the west and elsewhere. Adding to the fuel is internet usage including that of Myspace, Facebook and the younger Twitter. According to islamonline.net The US administration has delved into Iran’s election dispute by asking the micro-blogging website Twitter to delay maintenance shutdown to avoid disrupting communications among tech-savvy Iranian activists.
"This was just a call to say: 'It appears Twitter is playing an important role at a crucial time in Iran. Could you keep it going?'" P.J. Crowley, assistant secretary of state for public affairs, told the New York Times on Wednesday, June 17.
State Department official Jared Cohen e-mailed the social-networking site with the unusual request to delay its scheduled maintenance shutdown because of its use as a communications tool by Iranian activists who stage nonstop protests. There appears to be a vested interest in regards to the U.S. government seeing and having this protest against the current president. Sadly, those who are protesting and trying to remove the president from office are not questioning why Western nations are so interested in seeing the success of the protest movement. Perhaps for some it’s great to have western backing and they’ve been so thoroughly infiltrated mentally by an imperialist mindset that the closer they are to being westernized the better. Perhaps the imperialist-capitalistic value system is something many want to have after being exposed to so many broadcasts coming from the west to their own backyards. If that’s the case then of course one can’t blame the protestors for doing what they’re doing. However, if they’re seeking the freedom they say they want, then why are they fighting for a person or at the very least a situation that from all appearances is supported by a group of nations not too interested in the self-determination of Iran? This reverses an independent Iran does it not?
When a nation decides it wants to fight for freedom or their human rights they ought to do so on their own terms and according to the standards of the society within which they live. In more cases than not, they shouldn’t be attempting to live up to the standard or rules that are set up for them by system that has no true regard for their well being and freedom of mind and life. Too often in the history of people from the “third world” our leaders who’ve been supported and/or endorsed by the west as our saviors have been the one’s who’ve done the most damage to us and have exploited our being and our lands for the benefit of themselves, their families, their friends and rich racist nations. From Africa to Asia to South America this has historically been the case. Can the situation be any different now? Those who are protesting in Iran right now (not Ali’s who become Al or the Babaks who become Bob but the ones who say they really want something better for their nation) should really analyze why they are protesting, what they are protesting for and what they’re protesting against. Is the individual they protest in favor of really any good for them, will he have the best interest at heart for those who voted him into office or will he sell out his own people?